Adapted Academic Discussion
Human Resource Management · Dr. Rivera
This week, we are examining which workplace policy most effectively supports employees who care for children, older relatives, or family members with disabilities. Supporters and critics often begin from different assumptions about fairness, effectiveness, and the proper use of limited resources. In your response, explain which approach you find more convincing and why. You may build on the comments already posted, challenge part of a classmate's reasoning, or introduce a different relevant perspective. Use a specific reason or example so that your contribution moves the discussion forward rather than simply repeating a position.
Maya
I would make flexible schedules and remote work the main form of support because care responsibilities often involve unpredictable appointments and daily tasks, so control over working time can prevent avoidable absences. This approach could also make the policy easier to understand and evaluate over time. Even if it has some costs, a carefully designed pilot program could reveal whether the expected benefits actually reach the people who need them.
Leo
I would instead prioritize paid family leave and direct care benefits because flexibility cannot solve periods of intensive care, and lower-income workers may need actual time off or financial help more than schedule changes. A policy can sound attractive in theory but create unintended consequences in daily life. Before making a broad change, decision-makers should consider who carries the cost and whether a smaller, more flexible solution could achieve the same goal.
根据课程主题，按当前 TOEFL Academic Discussion 题型扩展改编，非官方原题。 查看 ETS 当前题型说明