Adapted Academic Discussion
Data Ethics · Dr. Morgan
This week, we are examining whether companies should be required to explain in plain language how they collect, use, and share customers' personal data. Supporters and critics often begin from different assumptions about fairness, effectiveness, and the proper use of limited resources. In your response, explain which approach you find more convincing and why. You may build on the comments already posted, challenge part of a classmate's reasoning, or introduce a different relevant perspective. Use a specific reason or example so that your contribution moves the discussion forward rather than simply repeating a position.
Maya
I would require a short and understandable explanation before data is collected because meaningful consent is impossible when people cannot tell what information a company keeps or who may receive it. This approach could also make the policy easier to understand and evaluate over time. Even if it has some costs, a carefully designed pilot program could reveal whether the expected benefits actually reach the people who need them.
Leo
I would instead use standardized summaries without requiring every technical detail because exhaustive notices can overwhelm users, hide the most important facts, and create heavy compliance costs without improving privacy. A policy can sound attractive in theory but create unintended consequences in daily life. Before making a broad change, decision-makers should consider who carries the cost and whether a smaller, more flexible solution could achieve the same goal.
根据课程主题，按当前 TOEFL Academic Discussion 题型扩展改编，非官方原题。 查看 ETS 当前题型说明