Adapted Academic Discussion
Business Ethics · Dr. Rivera
This week, we are examining whether companies should publicly explain the environmental effects of their products even when the information could reduce short-term sales. Supporters and critics often begin from different assumptions about fairness, effectiveness, and the proper use of limited resources. In your response, explain which approach you find more convincing and why. You may build on the comments already posted, challenge part of a classmate's reasoning, or introduce a different relevant perspective. Use a specific reason or example so that your contribution moves the discussion forward rather than simply repeating a position.
Maya
I would require clear and comparable environmental disclosure because customers and investors need reliable information to make informed choices, and transparency discourages companies from making vague green claims. This approach could also make the policy easier to understand and evaluate over time. Even if it has some costs, a carefully designed pilot program could reveal whether the expected benefits actually reach the people who need them.
Leo
I would instead allow firms to report voluntarily under broad industry guidelines because environmental estimates can be uncertain, and mandatory reporting may impose disproportionate costs on smaller companies. A policy can sound attractive in theory but create unintended consequences in daily life. Before making a broad change, decision-makers should consider who carries the cost and whether a smaller, more flexible solution could achieve the same goal.
根据课程主题，按当前 TOEFL Academic Discussion 题型扩展改编，非官方原题。 查看 ETS 当前题型说明