Adapted Academic Discussion
Urban Planning · Dr. Patel
This week, we are examining whether cities should prioritize small neighborhood parks or one large central park. Supporters and critics often begin from different assumptions about fairness, effectiveness, and the proper use of limited resources. In your response, explain which approach you find more convincing and why. You may build on the comments already posted, challenge part of a classmate's reasoning, or introduce a different relevant perspective. Use a specific reason or example so that your contribution moves the discussion forward rather than simply repeating a position.
Maya
I would create many small parks because nearby spaces are easier to use daily and can improve more neighborhoods. This approach could also make the policy easier to understand and evaluate over time. Even if it has some costs, a carefully designed pilot program could reveal whether the expected benefits actually reach the people who need them.
Leo
I would instead build a major central park because a large site can protect nature and support sports, festivals, and facilities that small parks cannot. A policy can sound attractive in theory but create unintended consequences in daily life. Before making a broad change, decision-makers should consider who carries the cost and whether a smaller, more flexible solution could achieve the same goal.
根据当前 TOEFL Academic Discussion 题型改编，非 ETS 官方原题。 查看 ETS 当前题型说明