Adapted Academic Discussion
Education · Dr. Morgan
This week, we are examining whether colleges should require a course in practical skills such as budgeting, communication, and basic legal knowledge. Supporters and critics often begin from different assumptions about fairness, effectiveness, and the proper use of limited resources. In your response, explain which approach you find more convincing and why. You may build on the comments already posted, challenge part of a classmate's reasoning, or introduce a different relevant perspective. Use a specific reason or example so that your contribution moves the discussion forward rather than simply repeating a position.
Maya
I would make one practical course mandatory because graduates need daily-life skills that specialized academic programs may never teach. This approach could also make the policy easier to understand and evaluate over time. Even if it has some costs, a carefully designed pilot program could reveal whether the expected benefits actually reach the people who need them.
Leo
I would instead keep these courses optional because degree time is limited and students can learn personal skills through workshops or experience. A policy can sound attractive in theory but create unintended consequences in daily life. Before making a broad change, decision-makers should consider who carries the cost and whether a smaller, more flexible solution could achieve the same goal.
根据当前 TOEFL Academic Discussion 题型改编，非 ETS 官方原题。 查看 ETS 当前题型说明